I’m just going to point something out:

johnnyis:

Any time an anti-theist makes the statement “if God existed He [would do | would have done] x,” they are making conjectural statements about the nature of God which must be supported with evidence. Otherwise, you can dismiss what is asserted arbitrarily. 

…I dont fully understand what he’s dying, but it sounds good!

(via tyneandweird)

4 months ago Via johnnyis
  1. lissettelovee reblogged this from johnnyis
  2. fourscoreandsevenyears reblogged this from hellomynameisliv and added:
    Haha. This is so ironic that I don’t even need to write anything witty.
  3. musiccolliding reblogged this from hellomynameisliv
  4. trispy reblogged this from tyneandweird and added:
    …I dont fully understand what he’s dying, but it sounds good!
  5. tyneandweird reblogged this from johnnyis
  6. deconversionmovement reblogged this from aneuralbuddhist and added:
    It isn’t considered...insult unless you assume...“Atheists...
  7. aneuralbuddhist reblogged this from deconversionmovement and added:
    lolol calm yourself fool. Did I not write: “not in response to this but rather generally”? “Who are you to tell me how...
  8. kaylahenderson reblogged this from sageoflogic and added:
    ^ Instant follow.
  9. sageoflogic reblogged this from deconversionmovement
  10. takemewithyoulord reblogged this from hellomynameisliv
  11. kylieeesue reblogged this from hellomynameisliv
  12. jackiegotsole reblogged this from descendingfire
  13. gonelikebirds reblogged this from timbre-wolf and added:
    any time a theist makes the statement ‘God exists’, they are also making a conjectural statement about the possibility...
  14. hellomynameisliv reblogged this from johnnyis
  15. descendingfire reblogged this from hellomynameisliv